Imaginary Money Beach
Field Notes Miranda Weigler Field Notes Miranda Weigler

Imaginary Money Beach

The Challengers were directly asking voters: how do we make the beach worth coming back to? And the entire political establishment dismissed that question as not mattering.

Read More
What Is Law, Actually?
Essays Miranda Weigler Essays Miranda Weigler

What Is Law, Actually?

There’s a saying I come back to often: If the penalty for breaking a rule is a fine, then that rule only exists for people who can’t afford to pay it.

People understand that. They may not say it in policy language. But they feel it, and when that gap goes unaddressed for long enough, something shifts. Trust erodes, not all at once, but steadily.

Read More
A tribute to Jerry Weigler
Essays Miranda Weigler Essays Miranda Weigler

A tribute to Jerry Weigler

My dad was my first experience of politics. He confidently advocated his beliefs and was always willing to take on bullies (mine and in the public sphere) on behalf of things he cared about. Many people in Oregon will remember him, often fondly, or still slightly salty about his many public battles and the friendly coalitions that somehow survived them. My dad didn't do politics for personal gain. I come by my earnestness honestly, even though not many people got to see that side of him.

Read More
Why DOGE Missed the Most Obvious Opportunity in Government
Essays Miranda Weigler Essays Miranda Weigler

Why DOGE Missed the Most Obvious Opportunity in Government

With genuine expertise in database management and UX design, DOGE could have approached tax filing the way a serious product team approaches a broken user experience: map the pain points, reduce unnecessary steps, build in real-time guidance, and design for the people who struggle most with the current system — not the ones with accountants and lawyers.

Read More
An Oz Sighting: Senator Reynolds and the Bill That Got the Wrong Villain
Field Notes Miranda Weigler Field Notes Miranda Weigler

An Oz Sighting: Senator Reynolds and the Bill That Got the Wrong Villain

"Marijuana" is not a neutral term. It was introduced deliberately in the 1930s by Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, specifically to create a racial association — to link cannabis to Mexican immigrants and Black jazz musicians and manufacture public fear. Young Oregonians know this. Anyone who has spent real time in the regulated cannabis industry knows this. When an elected official uses that word in 2026 to frame a policy intervention, it tells you something about which conversation they think they're having.

It's not the conversation Oregon's cannabis industry needs to be having right now.

Read More